As you can clearly see Millers so called CLOSET space was really Cathy Hawkins- Harrison. Does this woman EVER tell the truth? She knew this was Cathy's.
This blog was created to address concerns of the PVRS teachers, parents and children. Share with others to get the word out to all taxpayers in Northfield, Warwick, Bernardston, Leyden and School Choice Vernon. We also dedicate this page to Mike Duprey, you will always be PVRS to us and in our hearts .
Blog Archive
Wednesday, July 19, 2017
Update from newspaper
As you can clearly see Millers so called CLOSET space was really Cathy Hawkins- Harrison. Does this woman EVER tell the truth? She knew this was Cathy's.
hmm really!!
Hmmm....... I remember this being different last year concerning the school resource officer. Parents did not want this and felt it made the kids uncomfortable and them as well and we were turning our school more into a prison than a school. This idea was pushed onto parents and the towns by the Police Chief and Miller , the majority did not like the idea one bit nor did school choice who chose this school because it wasn't like BUHS.Now School choice has about disappeared from PVRS in the last two years and parents since Miller has come have pulled them from the school. Now local parents are finding other choices for their children's education.This did not help PVRS anymore than Miller, Bacon or Perry did and losing so many teachers these kids did depend on and trust, this is the final straw.
May 2, 2016
Some residents questioned whether a school resource officer was necessary in a small, rural school like Pioneer and asked why Northfield — one of four member towns of the district who would benefit from the officer — must front the cost for it.
Ruth Miller, the Pioneer superintendent, detailed the various roles the resource officer would serve, which include acting as a confidant to the students.
Read here
Resource Officer
Thursday, May 26, 2016
“A school that has a police officer on duty is a huge negative in my mind, and I’m against that unless there is a need for it,” he said. “I don’t see any reason. I can’t see how our school or the reputation of our school is helped by having an armed officer for my kid to see every morning when he walks in.”
Read it here
http://www.recorder.com/Sparks-fly-at-PVRSD-Committee-Meeting-Thursday-2425180
Confidant to the students? I can name a number of teachers these kids felt were safety to them and trustworthy to talk to , but whoops thats right Miller fired all of them! I never heard the kids state it was Igor. They liked him but they did not trust him. As for safety and drugs and weapons, well ask the parents of the kids Bacon humiliated and went thru parking lot cars with, Igor was NOT present . Oh and a couple of them kids were removed from the school due to this abuse by the parents. ( Another bad idea by the administration)
Igor is a great guy but he is not needed at PVRS and this is Millers idea and along with the rest of her ideas it proved to be a poor choice and hurt PVRS as far as students are concerned and parents who felt the need to by pass this choice as a school and others looking elsewhere.
FYI -- Kids did not feel more secure seeing an armed officer in the school or the boys being supervised when going into the bathrooms. Not to mention certain children due to race and color were targeted. (Nothing stereotype here going on.) Bacon & Perry did this as well with the females .I was told by many students they no longer felt safe at PVRS and they didn't like going to school anymore. I asked these same students at the end of the year how they felt , a few said I am glad to be graduating or would not come back and others said they wanted to go to another school.
When will this SC realize the destruction this and losing so many over two years has caused?
May 2, 2016
Some residents questioned whether a school resource officer was necessary in a small, rural school like Pioneer and asked why Northfield — one of four member towns of the district who would benefit from the officer — must front the cost for it.
Ruth Miller, the Pioneer superintendent, detailed the various roles the resource officer would serve, which include acting as a confidant to the students.
Read here
Resource Officer
Thursday, May 26, 2016
“A school that has a police officer on duty is a huge negative in my mind, and I’m against that unless there is a need for it,” he said. “I don’t see any reason. I can’t see how our school or the reputation of our school is helped by having an armed officer for my kid to see every morning when he walks in.”
Read it here
http://www.recorder.com/Sparks-fly-at-PVRSD-Committee-Meeting-Thursday-2425180
Confidant to the students? I can name a number of teachers these kids felt were safety to them and trustworthy to talk to , but whoops thats right Miller fired all of them! I never heard the kids state it was Igor. They liked him but they did not trust him. As for safety and drugs and weapons, well ask the parents of the kids Bacon humiliated and went thru parking lot cars with, Igor was NOT present . Oh and a couple of them kids were removed from the school due to this abuse by the parents. ( Another bad idea by the administration)
Igor is a great guy but he is not needed at PVRS and this is Millers idea and along with the rest of her ideas it proved to be a poor choice and hurt PVRS as far as students are concerned and parents who felt the need to by pass this choice as a school and others looking elsewhere.
FYI -- Kids did not feel more secure seeing an armed officer in the school or the boys being supervised when going into the bathrooms. Not to mention certain children due to race and color were targeted. (Nothing stereotype here going on.) Bacon & Perry did this as well with the females .I was told by many students they no longer felt safe at PVRS and they didn't like going to school anymore. I asked these same students at the end of the year how they felt , a few said I am glad to be graduating or would not come back and others said they wanted to go to another school.
When will this SC realize the destruction this and losing so many over two years has caused?
NORTHFIELD — Based on a Thursday vote of the Pioneer Valley Regional
School District School Committee, the district may be without a school
resource officer next year.
While looking at items to cut to meet the $14.2 million spending plan approved for next school year, eight members of the committee voted five-to-three not to fund Igor Komerzan’s position. Cutting it would save the district about $28,000.
However, it’s possible the decision might not hold, according to Superintendent Ruth Miller.
“There are people in the community that are very unhappy that this discussion occurred,” she said, noting discussion of the school resource officer’s position was not on the agenda. “I think they were feeling a little bit blindsided ... From what I’m hearing, people are going to demand that they vote with all the School Committee members present.”
School Committee members Robin L’Etoile and Jeanne Milton weren’t present, and Debra Gilbert left midway through the meeting before the vote, though the committee was able to reach a quorum.
Since Komerzan was hired as the school resource officer last
summer, Northfield has paid for about $40,000 of his income, not
including health insurance and a retirement plan, according to
Northfield Police Chief Robert Leighton. The school district pays the
remainder, with Komerzan resolving bullying issues, getting involved in
teaching classes, and dealing with crime from weapons possession to drug
dealing.
Leighton said he hasn’t officially been notified that the position has been dissolved, and won’t change anything until then. He said he hopes the decision will be reversed, noting that Komerzan was in fact able to save the district money.
“At one point, a lot of the certifications the teachers had for CPR expired,” he said. Ordinarily, the district would supply training, Leighton said, but Komerzan is a certified instructor.
“He was able to certify all those teachers and do it on the premises, with very little disruption to their schedules,” Leighton said. “And it didn’t cost the school a dime.”
For members of the School Committee who voted in favor of not funding the position, a tight budget was at the forefront of their decision.
However, the position was also approved by voters at last year’s annual town meeting.
“This is what parents and taxpayers want,” Leighton said.
Under Massachusetts General Law Chapter 71, Section 37P, it is a requirement for a chief of police to assign, in this case, a regional school district, with at least one school resource officer. However, upon written application, a school district can seek to have the state commissioner of elementary and secondary education waive the requirement if the commissioner agrees a school resource officer wouldn’t help the district in ensuring school safety. Or, if the chief of police in consultation with the superintendent determines there aren’t sufficient resources to assign a school resource officer, the chief will in turn consult with state police to ensure one is assigned.
While looking at items to cut to meet the $14.2 million spending plan approved for next school year, eight members of the committee voted five-to-three not to fund Igor Komerzan’s position. Cutting it would save the district about $28,000.
However, it’s possible the decision might not hold, according to Superintendent Ruth Miller.
“There are people in the community that are very unhappy that this discussion occurred,” she said, noting discussion of the school resource officer’s position was not on the agenda. “I think they were feeling a little bit blindsided ... From what I’m hearing, people are going to demand that they vote with all the School Committee members present.”
School Committee members Robin L’Etoile and Jeanne Milton weren’t present, and Debra Gilbert left midway through the meeting before the vote, though the committee was able to reach a quorum.
Leighton said he hasn’t officially been notified that the position has been dissolved, and won’t change anything until then. He said he hopes the decision will be reversed, noting that Komerzan was in fact able to save the district money.
“At one point, a lot of the certifications the teachers had for CPR expired,” he said. Ordinarily, the district would supply training, Leighton said, but Komerzan is a certified instructor.
“He was able to certify all those teachers and do it on the premises, with very little disruption to their schedules,” Leighton said. “And it didn’t cost the school a dime.”
For members of the School Committee who voted in favor of not funding the position, a tight budget was at the forefront of their decision.
However, the position was also approved by voters at last year’s annual town meeting.
“This is what parents and taxpayers want,” Leighton said.
Under Massachusetts General Law Chapter 71, Section 37P, it is a requirement for a chief of police to assign, in this case, a regional school district, with at least one school resource officer. However, upon written application, a school district can seek to have the state commissioner of elementary and secondary education waive the requirement if the commissioner agrees a school resource officer wouldn’t help the district in ensuring school safety. Or, if the chief of police in consultation with the superintendent determines there aren’t sufficient resources to assign a school resource officer, the chief will in turn consult with state police to ensure one is assigned.
https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartI/TitleXII/Chapter71/Section37P
If you think you can pull that one think again, that law was basically made for city and inner city schools not rural. Stop Lying!
Tuesday, July 18, 2017
Yep we have something to say
Not only is it BS that Pioneer has contended with morale and staffing this year but the previous year as well.It seems that since Miller has come here we continue to lose employees and herself and others in her office get raises. Why is that? Also, why is it that this program owes so much money and why is it we have not heard the answers to that ? How can a program that you have to pay for to eat or is subsidized by the state for free lunches be this deep in debt? Again people lost their jobs to fix a problem that should of never gotten this far outta control.
Example.
Miller- Her income went up -639.00
Plus expenses -total 5000.00
Asst Superintendent-Healy went up -11,150.00 WHAT THE HELL IS THAT
ADMIN Asst to Superintendent- went up 4,210.00
Oh theirs more but lets move on
Bacon salary went up 3.070.00
VP salary went up -54,946.00 WHAT!
oh and more
653,457.00 WAS SAVED BY REMOVING TEACHERS! Seriously! You give yourselves and admin raises and trash the teachers!
Read yourselves here, flipping unbelievable.. look at what went up and what went down. .
FY18 Budget
Miller I have to hand it to you , your history doesn't change.
Now how about you and Healy tell us how this school lunch program got so bad ? This you can't blame on Dayle Dorion. So who are these two jackasses gonna throw under the bus now?
Sadly more people are without an income and will struggle while our administration gets raises and acts like nothing happen. I'm sorry but Gail Healy deserves no respect or recognition when it comes off the backs of those who need jobs. PERIOD.
Also what was not mentioned was lunch was going up .10 cents.
Pioneer Valley Regional School, which has had to contend with some fiscal, morale and staffing difficulties this past year, seems to have ended the year with some success.
Changes in staffing in the food service operation will start cutting into its $220,000 deficit, discovered unexpectedly this year. The changes are expected to save the district $46,248 in its first year and $77,076 in the second year.
According to Assistant Superintendent Gail Healy, who is also the district’s food service director, the savings comes primarily from staff reductions. Bernardston Elementary School’s cafeteria manager was laid off, and Northfield Elementary School’s assistant cafeteria manager retired. We are sure it was a difficult move for Healy to make, but it’s her job to make her program live within its means.
This plan came after parents and others objected to an earlier plan to consolidate food preparation at Pioneer Valley Regional School. By not filling the two positions and shifting roles of those who remain, Healy said the new plan will actually save the district more money than an earlier one proposed in April.
The main goal is to reduce the school lunch fund deficit, which topped $201,000 last year and startled the auditors, who said such a deficit for a district the size of Pioneer is enormous. Since then, the figure has continued to grow to about $220,000.
By additional consolidation before the 2018-2019 school year, Healy expects to save an additional $30,829 the second year.
When Pioneer Cafeteria Manager Sue Wood retires after next school year, her position will be eliminated. Instead, the district will seek a district-wide cafeteria manager who will be responsible for tasks like food bidding, filing state reports and ordering food through the Department of Defense’s Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program.
“We’re trying to save money by cutting down who does all these things,” Healy said.
Next school year, one Pioneer cafeteria helper, who assists with food preparation, serving and cleanup, will instead split her time between Northfield Elementary School and Bernardston Elementary School, working the same number of hours, Healy said. The helper, she said, already practiced the rotation before the school year ended.
Additionally, Pioneer’s two cashiers will each work two hours per day instead of three. With the helper working at the elementary school, Pioneer will have five food service staff instead of six.
Healy said between managers and helpers, staff will always have assistance.
While some of the changes won’t be welcome by everyone — especially those directly affected — they were tough but necessary changes to start the process of returning the food service to fiscal health at a cost taxpayer’s can afford. Healy and her team should be commended for their effort
Example.
Miller- Her income went up -639.00
Plus expenses -total 5000.00
Asst Superintendent-Healy went up -11,150.00 WHAT THE HELL IS THAT
ADMIN Asst to Superintendent- went up 4,210.00
Oh theirs more but lets move on
Bacon salary went up 3.070.00
VP salary went up -54,946.00 WHAT!
oh and more
653,457.00 WAS SAVED BY REMOVING TEACHERS! Seriously! You give yourselves and admin raises and trash the teachers!
Read yourselves here, flipping unbelievable.. look at what went up and what went down. .
FY18 Budget
Miller I have to hand it to you , your history doesn't change.
Now how about you and Healy tell us how this school lunch program got so bad ? This you can't blame on Dayle Dorion. So who are these two jackasses gonna throw under the bus now?
Sadly more people are without an income and will struggle while our administration gets raises and acts like nothing happen. I'm sorry but Gail Healy deserves no respect or recognition when it comes off the backs of those who need jobs. PERIOD.
Also what was not mentioned was lunch was going up .10 cents.
Pioneer Valley Regional School, which has had to contend with some fiscal, morale and staffing difficulties this past year, seems to have ended the year with some success.
Changes in staffing in the food service operation will start cutting into its $220,000 deficit, discovered unexpectedly this year. The changes are expected to save the district $46,248 in its first year and $77,076 in the second year.
According to Assistant Superintendent Gail Healy, who is also the district’s food service director, the savings comes primarily from staff reductions. Bernardston Elementary School’s cafeteria manager was laid off, and Northfield Elementary School’s assistant cafeteria manager retired. We are sure it was a difficult move for Healy to make, but it’s her job to make her program live within its means.
This plan came after parents and others objected to an earlier plan to consolidate food preparation at Pioneer Valley Regional School. By not filling the two positions and shifting roles of those who remain, Healy said the new plan will actually save the district more money than an earlier one proposed in April.
The main goal is to reduce the school lunch fund deficit, which topped $201,000 last year and startled the auditors, who said such a deficit for a district the size of Pioneer is enormous. Since then, the figure has continued to grow to about $220,000.
When Pioneer Cafeteria Manager Sue Wood retires after next school year, her position will be eliminated. Instead, the district will seek a district-wide cafeteria manager who will be responsible for tasks like food bidding, filing state reports and ordering food through the Department of Defense’s Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program.
“We’re trying to save money by cutting down who does all these things,” Healy said.
Next school year, one Pioneer cafeteria helper, who assists with food preparation, serving and cleanup, will instead split her time between Northfield Elementary School and Bernardston Elementary School, working the same number of hours, Healy said. The helper, she said, already practiced the rotation before the school year ended.
Additionally, Pioneer’s two cashiers will each work two hours per day instead of three. With the helper working at the elementary school, Pioneer will have five food service staff instead of six.
Healy said between managers and helpers, staff will always have assistance.
While some of the changes won’t be welcome by everyone — especially those directly affected — they were tough but necessary changes to start the process of returning the food service to fiscal health at a cost taxpayer’s can afford. Healy and her team should be commended for their effort
Monday, July 17, 2017
Nothing in a year has changed for the better
I found this article written a year ago by Sue O’Reilly-McRae. She tells it like it is for many of PVRS parents ,students and teachers.. Here we are a year later and still no answers and PVRS has only gotten worst. A school committee which is suppose to be the support line for all, is a support line to nothing. I too, wish Pat Shearer would show us the law in which it states :
At the June meeting, the School Committee chair and other members referenced Massachusetts general law as the reason why they would not/could not respond to our concerns. I would love for the School Committee to cite exactly where in Massachusetts general law it says that a school committee may not respond to parent, staff, and community concerns.
I have so far been unable to find this law. So now were calling you out Pat Shearer show us the law if we don't hear from you will we assume your lying like you all have been since you lied about Dayle Dorion and pushed her out of our school.People want answers and so far you have shown lack of support towards us and our school and its members.
What we do know is Miller made life and a job for Wehrli impossible with threats and demands because she did not know how to execute her job and about the Superintendents award which was the final straw. for him. For Mike it was his integrity and asking he did things against them and for Cathy HH , it seems Bacon and the VP believed they could do her job and she wasn't needed. Lets also not forget that Miller had the phones bugged ( which is why I past tech left for better pastures he refused to do it) and their emails.
As each brick fell our school committee sat by and watched it fall and did nothing to stop it. Now they have a budget outta control and money being spent on Miller and her office personals that on the charts is off the charts for a rural school.An extravagant amount of money has gone back and forth moving her when it could of been spent wisely fixing up the old Superintendents offices which was clearly told to this committee could be done for half the expense.
Lets keep going. Parents and teachers alike were against the resource officer and here we are with an added expense and now they want to cut him from the budget , this was discussed at the last meeting "they decided not to fund the school resource officer for next year. And two is they won't pay Pam $14,000 for document digitization. But, because there were only 8 committee members present to vote and those topics weren't even on the agenda, Miller is planning to have a re-vote next month, so it's unclear if either decision will hold." This is what Miller does and she will do it till she gets the answer she wants and she did this also in Templeton and they ended up with no emergency personnel in order to fund her budget she went Nuclear and was voted down twice and third time won, but mind you in a very deceiving way .(For the story its recorded in the first few months of the blogs beginning)
A retraction will soon hit the newspaper concerning Millers so called STORAGE space which in fact was Cathy HH space for many years! This womans conceit, lies and lack of morals continues to amaze me.
So parents, teachers and taxpayers alike keep writing the dept of ED and don't bother wasting time with the school committee they have shown to be nonsupporting and caring of our school they are suppose to protect.
As for you Pat Shearer we are waiting for the answer to the question . WHERE IN MASS GENERAL LAW DOES IT STATE YOU CANNOT RESPOND TO OUR CONCERNS . THE CLOCK IS TICKING AND IN THE MEANTIME I PLAN ON MAKING CALLS TO FIND OUT AND I PROMISE YOU IF I FIND OUT THIS IS NOT TRUE IT WILL BE REPORTED. OUR TAXES FUND YOU AND IN CASE YOU FORGOT YOU WORK FOR US
by Sue O’Reilly-McRae.
Since just before the December holiday break, I have been a heartbroken Pioneer Valley Regional School parent.
As a 30-year educator, mother of two successful PVRS students, and an advocate for public education, I was stunned and deeply saddened to learn of the unexpected resignation of our long-time principal, Bill Wehrli.
Bill had been the principal of PVRS since my oldest son, now a sophomore in college, began attending as a seventh-grader. Over the eight years that I have observed and interacted with PVRS as a parent and fellow educator, I’ve watched our school grow and evolve, hire new and dynamic staff, and sustain its commitment to the arts and athletics. I observed and experienced an unmistakable investment and pride in the administrative team that supported PVRS: Bill Wehrli as principal, Mike Duprey as assistant principal, and Cathy Hawkins-Harrison as dean of students.
When I learned of Wehrli’s resignation, I was grief-stricken. Not just for the loss of this one administrator from our school, but for what this type of resignation signaled about what was suddenly happening at a school I care deeply about. I knew how dedicated to our school community Bill Wehrli was, and I believe that he would have never left midyear without speaking with students unless something professionally intolerable was happening to him.
Now several other key administrators have felt the need to
leave our district. Mike Duprey has resigned from PVRS. I am confident
that like Wehrli, he would not step away from the school he is devoted
to unless his professional experience there had likewise become
intolerable.
I believe that what we had in the leadership team at PVRS was a model of sustainable leadership. Andy Hargreaves and Dean Fink in their 2006 scholarly article — based on 15 years of work investigating school change — suggest that, “sustainable leadership respects and builds on the past in its quest to create a better future ... it doesn’t treat people’s knowledge, experience, and careers as disposable waste but as valuable, renewable, and recombinable resources.”
I believe that every devoted educator takes their work personally. We pour our creative energy into our relationships, the curriculum experiences we devise, and the academic support systems we create. Teaching and supervising teachers is very personal work; the best educators put their hearts, their whole person on the line in an effort to reach every student, every staff member, and to support growth, development and learning for all.
Throughout this stressful year, the teachers at PVRS have continued to love, care for, and teach our children. Thank you. In spite of the ongoing administrative turmoil you have sustained, you focus on and are committed to our children. I am so grateful for each one of you.
Hargreaves and Fink suggest that “the greatest source of trust in an organization … is communication trust, meaning that there is clear, frequent, open, high-level and reciprocal communication. Without communication, trust ... feelings and attributions of suspicion and betrayal infect an organization like a plague.” Since Wehrli’s resignation in December, parents, teachers, students, and community members have been asking for communication that would somehow restore the trust we had in our former superintendents — trust that has been further broken by the subsequent resignations of additional valued administrators.
I and others across the four towns in our district have contacted our School Committee members requesting information that might help us make sense of what is happening. Not only has this information not been forthcoming but at the May committee meeting citizen concerns like those I’ve stated here were eloquently and passionately voiced by former administrators, parents, students and teachers. These concerns were not addressed by the committee and were later discussed, after most of the concerned community members had left.
At the May and June PVRS School Committee meetings, former Pioneer district administrator Scott Lyman and other concerned parents and community members requested that the committee refuse to accept any additional administrator resignations until exit interviews were conducted by the School Committee to determine why we are suddenly losing so many valued administrators. Did you refuse to accept Mr. Duprey’s resignation, as Lyman and many others requested and, signaled by enthusiastic applause from around the room, the larger community seconded? Have you conducted exit interviews with other administrators?
At the May meeting we were listened to and not responded to. At the June meeting, the School Committee chair and other members referenced Massachusetts general law as the reason why they would not/could not respond to our concerns. I would love for the School Committee to cite exactly where in Massachusetts general law it says that a school committee may not respond to parent, staff, and community concerns.
District residents: please make every effort to call and/or write to your School Committee members if you share my concerns. The current PVRS website can be accessed at www.pvrsdk12.org/ and contact information for each School Committee member is listed under the School Committee tab at the top of the web page. Please attend the upcoming school committee meeting at PVRS .. The PVRS community has been seeking understanding for too long.
At the June meeting, the School Committee chair and other members referenced Massachusetts general law as the reason why they would not/could not respond to our concerns. I would love for the School Committee to cite exactly where in Massachusetts general law it says that a school committee may not respond to parent, staff, and community concerns.
I have so far been unable to find this law. So now were calling you out Pat Shearer show us the law if we don't hear from you will we assume your lying like you all have been since you lied about Dayle Dorion and pushed her out of our school.People want answers and so far you have shown lack of support towards us and our school and its members.
What we do know is Miller made life and a job for Wehrli impossible with threats and demands because she did not know how to execute her job and about the Superintendents award which was the final straw. for him. For Mike it was his integrity and asking he did things against them and for Cathy HH , it seems Bacon and the VP believed they could do her job and she wasn't needed. Lets also not forget that Miller had the phones bugged ( which is why I past tech left for better pastures he refused to do it) and their emails.
As each brick fell our school committee sat by and watched it fall and did nothing to stop it. Now they have a budget outta control and money being spent on Miller and her office personals that on the charts is off the charts for a rural school.An extravagant amount of money has gone back and forth moving her when it could of been spent wisely fixing up the old Superintendents offices which was clearly told to this committee could be done for half the expense.
Lets keep going. Parents and teachers alike were against the resource officer and here we are with an added expense and now they want to cut him from the budget , this was discussed at the last meeting "they decided not to fund the school resource officer for next year. And two is they won't pay Pam $14,000 for document digitization. But, because there were only 8 committee members present to vote and those topics weren't even on the agenda, Miller is planning to have a re-vote next month, so it's unclear if either decision will hold." This is what Miller does and she will do it till she gets the answer she wants and she did this also in Templeton and they ended up with no emergency personnel in order to fund her budget she went Nuclear and was voted down twice and third time won, but mind you in a very deceiving way .(For the story its recorded in the first few months of the blogs beginning)
A retraction will soon hit the newspaper concerning Millers so called STORAGE space which in fact was Cathy HH space for many years! This womans conceit, lies and lack of morals continues to amaze me.
So parents, teachers and taxpayers alike keep writing the dept of ED and don't bother wasting time with the school committee they have shown to be nonsupporting and caring of our school they are suppose to protect.
As for you Pat Shearer we are waiting for the answer to the question . WHERE IN MASS GENERAL LAW DOES IT STATE YOU CANNOT RESPOND TO OUR CONCERNS . THE CLOCK IS TICKING AND IN THE MEANTIME I PLAN ON MAKING CALLS TO FIND OUT AND I PROMISE YOU IF I FIND OUT THIS IS NOT TRUE IT WILL BE REPORTED. OUR TAXES FUND YOU AND IN CASE YOU FORGOT YOU WORK FOR US
by Sue O’Reilly-McRae.
Since just before the December holiday break, I have been a heartbroken Pioneer Valley Regional School parent.
As a 30-year educator, mother of two successful PVRS students, and an advocate for public education, I was stunned and deeply saddened to learn of the unexpected resignation of our long-time principal, Bill Wehrli.
Bill had been the principal of PVRS since my oldest son, now a sophomore in college, began attending as a seventh-grader. Over the eight years that I have observed and interacted with PVRS as a parent and fellow educator, I’ve watched our school grow and evolve, hire new and dynamic staff, and sustain its commitment to the arts and athletics. I observed and experienced an unmistakable investment and pride in the administrative team that supported PVRS: Bill Wehrli as principal, Mike Duprey as assistant principal, and Cathy Hawkins-Harrison as dean of students.
When I learned of Wehrli’s resignation, I was grief-stricken. Not just for the loss of this one administrator from our school, but for what this type of resignation signaled about what was suddenly happening at a school I care deeply about. I knew how dedicated to our school community Bill Wehrli was, and I believe that he would have never left midyear without speaking with students unless something professionally intolerable was happening to him.
I believe that what we had in the leadership team at PVRS was a model of sustainable leadership. Andy Hargreaves and Dean Fink in their 2006 scholarly article — based on 15 years of work investigating school change — suggest that, “sustainable leadership respects and builds on the past in its quest to create a better future ... it doesn’t treat people’s knowledge, experience, and careers as disposable waste but as valuable, renewable, and recombinable resources.”
I believe that every devoted educator takes their work personally. We pour our creative energy into our relationships, the curriculum experiences we devise, and the academic support systems we create. Teaching and supervising teachers is very personal work; the best educators put their hearts, their whole person on the line in an effort to reach every student, every staff member, and to support growth, development and learning for all.
Throughout this stressful year, the teachers at PVRS have continued to love, care for, and teach our children. Thank you. In spite of the ongoing administrative turmoil you have sustained, you focus on and are committed to our children. I am so grateful for each one of you.
Hargreaves and Fink suggest that “the greatest source of trust in an organization … is communication trust, meaning that there is clear, frequent, open, high-level and reciprocal communication. Without communication, trust ... feelings and attributions of suspicion and betrayal infect an organization like a plague.” Since Wehrli’s resignation in December, parents, teachers, students, and community members have been asking for communication that would somehow restore the trust we had in our former superintendents — trust that has been further broken by the subsequent resignations of additional valued administrators.
I and others across the four towns in our district have contacted our School Committee members requesting information that might help us make sense of what is happening. Not only has this information not been forthcoming but at the May committee meeting citizen concerns like those I’ve stated here were eloquently and passionately voiced by former administrators, parents, students and teachers. These concerns were not addressed by the committee and were later discussed, after most of the concerned community members had left.
At the May and June PVRS School Committee meetings, former Pioneer district administrator Scott Lyman and other concerned parents and community members requested that the committee refuse to accept any additional administrator resignations until exit interviews were conducted by the School Committee to determine why we are suddenly losing so many valued administrators. Did you refuse to accept Mr. Duprey’s resignation, as Lyman and many others requested and, signaled by enthusiastic applause from around the room, the larger community seconded? Have you conducted exit interviews with other administrators?
At the May meeting we were listened to and not responded to. At the June meeting, the School Committee chair and other members referenced Massachusetts general law as the reason why they would not/could not respond to our concerns. I would love for the School Committee to cite exactly where in Massachusetts general law it says that a school committee may not respond to parent, staff, and community concerns.
District residents: please make every effort to call and/or write to your School Committee members if you share my concerns. The current PVRS website can be accessed at www.pvrsdk12.org/ and contact information for each School Committee member is listed under the School Committee tab at the top of the web page. Please attend the upcoming school committee meeting at PVRS .. The PVRS community has been seeking understanding for too long.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)