Blog Archive

Wednesday, July 13, 2016

More Hog wash

Seems when someone has something   to hide is when you get this nonsense. Young needs to be replaced . Also its been over two weeks and nothing has been updated or responded to.
Glenn Koocher seems to say they can do what they want and the people don't matter.

NORTHFIELD — While some members of the public have been frustrated by lack of answers from the Pioneer Valley Regional School Committee about recent staffing concerns, the leader of the state association of school boards says the lack of communication is not uncommon or without reason.
Executive Director of the Massachusetts Association of School Committees Glenn Koocher, who has been in the role for 16 years and served on the Cambridge School Committee for 12 years, said the majority of Massachusetts school boards do not respond to public comments.
“If it’s public comment period, individual committees have their own rules about whether or not they will interact with the public,” Koocher explained. “Usually, school committees do not respond to public comment (but) if it’s appropriate, they can change that.”
Koocher said “it is up to the chair to try to manage what happens” during board meetings.
During a recent Pioneer board meeting, residents sought answers to whether exit interviews had been conducted with recently resigned staff members — an idea that was proposed during the May meeting — and whether a $477,487 budget shortfall, which was reported last September, was resolved.
Initially, Committee Chairwoman Patricia Shearer said that residents would be invited to express their concerns and, after all of the concerns had been voiced, the board would provide answers to each question. But, a few complaints later, Shearer retracted her statement in favor of not responding to the public’s questions, saying, “I think that I misspoke.”
“There’s no manual to deal with the situation you have here right now,” said Jack Killeen of Bernardston during June’s meeting. “I think that there is a communication problem within this community.”
According to the board’s 882-page book of policies and operational procedures, “citizen complaints shall be referred to the superintendent for follow-up action.” In the book’s Code of Ethics, it also states that all board members agree to “discuss (complaints) at committee meetings only if administrative solutions fail and/or require joint resolution.”
Occasionally, Koocher said, an interactive hearing is called, particularly when budgeting issues are to be decided.
However, board members are responsible for policy making and monitoring the budget, as well as hiring and evaluating the superintendent. Day-to-day oversight of schools, Koocher said, “is done by the superintendent with some measure of autonomy.”
As the board’s role isn’t administrative, members are removed from decisions concerning school personnel. And, as Superintendent Ruth Miller stated during May’s meeting, she cannot publicly discuss personnel issues due to privacy laws, leaving a lot of questions concerning recent staff changes that are likely to go unanswered.
“Statewide, these are issues that take place,” Koocher said of the public’s frustrations.
At June’s meeting, the board decided that answers to citizens’ questions that can be addressed publicly should be put on the Pioneer Valley Regional School District website within the next two weeks.
“It is time to use the website to document some facts,” said board member David Young. He added that, due to the privacy laws, why an employee left will not be addressed.
Young said that he has also led discussions concerning either moving citizens’ concerns to the end of each board meeting, as opposed to the start, or eliminating public comment from the formal meeting altogether. Eliminating public comment would still adhere to the board’s policy, which is consistent with the open meeting law, Young said. He said nothing has been decided with respect to change.

4 comments:

  1. They heard your concerns and they disagree with you. Pretty simple stuff. If you want to implement different policies, then run for school committee.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A jackass could do a better job than this School Committee.
      They heard nothing, They know they made a mistake and they are doing nothing but trying to bury it.

      Delete
  2. Or maybe it was time for Dayle to go, along with all her other lazy, incapable, over-paid assistants. Yes, change was needed all around...including with the school committee. Shearer needs to go next.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think what is sad is the values we seem to be losing . Trust, loyalty and honesty seem to be falling by the roadside. What I mean by this is the miscommunication, or should I say lack of , everything hush hush . I disagree about Dayle if parents asked a question you got an answer.Young as well needs to go. Its time for new blood on SC, this lot has been on way to long .

    ReplyDelete