Blog Archive

Friday, June 3, 2016

The Building

Today as I was  sitting and waiting to do a pick up at the school, I looked at the old superintendent building . From the outside of this building it looks in pretty good shape. I have been coming to this school around 8 years now, and it has always been here . That's a long time for  a temp building , wouldn't you think? If these office modular units  were to be temporary did the school committee have a plan to replace them? When? They are now 20 years old !

Than I started thinking about the other building the new superintendent now  resides in, and FYI wants to buy , according to the minutes I read in Warwick, Selectboard meeting .

        Town of Warwick
                                                            Selectboard
                                                       February 9, 2016
                                                               Minutes
Members present: Dawn Magi, Lawrence Pruyne
Member absent: Nick Arguimbau 
Others present: Town Coordinator David Young, Town Secretary Rosa
Fratangelo, PVRSD Superintendent Ruth Miller, PVRSD School Committee
member Martha Morse, Susan Wright, Steve Ruggiero, Jon Calcari, Rachel
Rapkin (Greenfield Recorder)

 I.  Call to Order 
Chair Magi called the meeting to order at 6:00 pm in the Town Hall.
Members of the Finance Committee had been invited but were unable to
attend.
Young read aloud two letters sent to the Selectboard from students in
Ms. Mullen's 3rd and 4th grade class at Warwick Community School (WCS).
The letters thanked the Board for allowing the students to keep all the
sports equipment that had belonged to the Recreation Committee.
II. Presentations and Discussions
1. FY 17 PVRSD Proposed Budget--PVRSD Superintendent Ruth Miller began
by praising WCS, noting it is consistently a Level 1 school with an
amazing principal and a team that works really well together. She
characterized WCS as "very impressive".
 Superintendent Miller started with the revenue fact sheet which showed
Warwick's proposed FY 17 minimum contribution at $484,645.00 and the
total assessment at $833,309.00. She noted that Warwick's assessment,
which is based on enrollment, reflects an increase of 1.57%. Miller
explained the figures on the revenue sheet in some detail, including
state aid and local aid. The total revenues for all four towns were
listed at $13,847,927.00.
 Miller said that she had tried to keep the budget in line with
revenues so as not to have to come back to the towns. She said that it
was clear that the towns have been very supportive of the District, but
have struggled over the past few years of increased assessments. The
fact sheet for Warwick assessments showed the percentage of increases
for FY 14 - 5.79%; FY 15 - 5.03%; FY 16 - 2.30%; proposed FY 17 - 1.57%.
Also noted were the enrollment figures over the past few years: FY 14 -
925; FY 15 - 892; FY 16 - 889; FY 17 842. Miller said that enrollment
numbers for Leyden and Warwick have remained about the same, while
Northfield has now lost 26 or 27 students and Bernardston is down to one
class per grade from two classes per grade.
 Miller said that seven Instructional Assistants (paraprofessionals)
positions are slated to be cut,( remember in the newspaper it was 8 
and noted that these are not those who
assist with special education. One position is in Northfield, four are
in Bernardston with one of those being a result of retirement and not
filling the vacancy, and two from the library at the high school. She
said that the High School loses between 25 and thirty students every
year and that raising the budget does not make much sense when
enrollment declines annually. She said that she favored bringing back
pep rallies, making junior varsity and varsity sports more competitive,
and that the District needs more promotion to let the area communities
what they have to offer. Miller noted that recently some students have
been leaving PVRHS for specific programs at other schools. She pointed
out that the high school loses more students each year than any other in
Franklin County. Miller said that great schools attract families and
Warwick has a great school. She said that she has started a Facebook
page for PVRSD and wants the elementary schools to do the same to
promote what they each have to offer. Pruyne suggested using a student
from GCC or UMass Amherst as a publicity intern for the District.
 Miller noted that the teachers are really committed and that they care
and work hard. She explained the finer points of the numbers for the
various accounts listed on the proposed FY 17 budget sheet. She also
explained how the numbers worked with special education with respect to
money from grants and the streamlined budget. She pointed out savings in
electricity and fuel. 
 Young said that future capital costs for technology are now reflected
in the budget. He noted that the Pioneer bond debt will be retired now
that the final Warwick payment of about $55,000.00 is being paid in FY
16.
 Miller discussed the building in which the Superintendents office is
currently located and asked for opinions on purchase versus continuing
to rent. She asked the Board's opinion about the future of the District
offices which have moved to rented space. Steve Ruggiero suggested he
might favor buying the building and being a landlord of any unused
space.
 There was a consensus that purchase of the building would be a good
idea if the building is in good shape and offered at a good price.
Miller said that she wanted more input from the towns because ultimately
it is they who ultimately pay the bill. 
 Magi said that she had a much better feeling about the budget talks
this year. Miller said that the budget was not perfect but that it was
doable.
   
2. Public Comment-- None.

III. Adjournment 
At 7:10 p.m., Pruyne MOVED to adjourn. Magi SECONDED. Motion CARRIED
2-0-0. 

Documents consulted at this meeting:

*Two letters to the Selectboard from Students in Ms. Mullen's 3rd and
4th grade class at Warwick 
 Community, both dated February 4, 2016
*Revenue Sheet for PVRSD
*Warwick Assessment for PVRSD by fiscal year (FY 14 - FY 17) for PVRSD 
*Proposed FY 17 budget for PVRSD 
( Miller said that she had tried to keep the budget in line with
revenues so as not to have to come back to the towns,and than it comes 
"the BUILDING"  Just in case your wondering , this building
is listed at $450,000.00. )
http://www.loopnet.com/Listing/19421248/168-Main-Street-Northfield-MA/

 
 Now lets think about the new  building. 
 
1- It cost over 3600.00 to rent ( what was the security deposit, and where
 did the funds come from for it? As well as the rent. )YOUR A TAXPAYER IT'S YOUR MONEY ,
YOU HAVE A RIGHT TO KNOW .  
 
2-What is the monthly cost for the electric, heat, air conditioning,water,sewage, 
security system,( I am sure  it has one) and the insurance as well to cover cost of computers and 
other office equipment ?  Again where is that money coming from? 
 YOUR A TAXPAYER IT'S YOUR MONEY ,YOU HAVE A RIGHT 
TO KNOW . 
 
3- The  fact is they are throwing away valuable resources for a major rental cost they should have 
seen coming. I mean they must of had a plan on what they were going to do right?  After all the other 
building was suppose to be temporary  20 years is a long temporary .  Again you have to ask yourself,  
 Did the school committee have a plan to replace them? 
When?
Why after all this time ? (20 Years ) If its a small amount of mold that was an  issue as to why it was
 moved,than  why wasn't more than one contractor hired to do an evaluation, to ensure the school 
committee that money wasn't being wasted? Was this done? I am sure tax payers will  want to 
know. As well as the heating and cooling . Remember what we heard from Scott McKusick at the 
School Committee meeting, this was not as bad as we were told. 

 
4- Again where is this money coming from, and explain how the expense will not hurt the children 
and education funds down the road., and tax payers.

5-At the end of the day we have a temp building sitting empty ,that a contractor
stated was not in bad shape and could be cleaned up cheaply, and another 
building costing money, and will continue to cost money and nobody is saying how
it's being funded. Personally I think the Superintendents building  should be 
located next to the school, not miles down the road . 
 
 
6-Now here is some info you are not aware of.In Templeton where Miller 
is from, one of the first things she did was move the Superintendents office to 
a new location. hmmmmm
 
From a Templeton citizen , 
Our Office story here was a renovation of the former industrial arts and she spent or 85,000.00 on just that alone. Easily could have had the job done for half or less but it’s not her taxes she was spending.  There are many things she did related to money that made the budget shrink quickly.
She has just started with Pioneer funds but with a warning this time to be under a close watch.
We have been warned .
 
 

No comments:

Post a Comment